February 25, 2010
Verbatim, as delivered
Chairman Berman’s opening remarks at hearing,
“Promoting Security through Diplomacy and Development: The Fiscal Year 2011 International Affairs
Budget”
Witness: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
Madam Secretary, we appreciate this
opportunity to explore with you the President’s International Affairs budget
request for fiscal year 2011, the supplemental appropriations request for the
current fiscal year, and the various policy initiatives you have championed as
Secretary of State.
This is the second budget request
submitted by this Administration, but the first one prepared from start to
finish under President Obama’s and your leadership. So this is the first
opportunity for Congress and the nation to see a clear and comprehensive
picture of your vision and the priorities you have set.
We applaud the President’s decision
to define “national security” to include not only the Defense budget, but also
the International Affairs budget.
As you have said on many
occasions,
Regrettably, this point
was brought home by the recent deaths of a dedicated Foreign Service Officer in
the Haitian earthquake and seven CIA officers at the hands of a suicide bomber
in
Our diplomats and development specialists
work day and night to head off international crises before they erupt, and to
prevent the onset of failed states where terrorists who threaten our security
find safe haven.
Over the long run, these civilian
efforts are much more cost-effective than putting our brave soldiers in harm’s
way. Investing in the international
affairs budget is the proverbial ounce of prevention. For example, if we are to resolve the Iranian
nuclear crisis, whether by diplomacy or sanctions, it will be thanks mainly to the
creativity and hard work of our diplomats and civil servants.
Madam Secretary, you have set out
very clear priorities in this budget:
Working with local partners to defeat al Qaeda in
There may be differences of opinion
about the relative priority of these initiatives and the optimal amount of
funding for specific countries and programs. But I, and I hope my colleagues on
this committee, will do everything we can to maintain the overall funding level
because we recognize – as you do – that diplomacy and development are integral
to our national security.
In fact, a full 18 percent of the
International Affairs budget request – or $10.8 billion -- is for the frontline
states of
By having the State Department
assume responsibility for these programs, we place them in civilian hands where
they belong and allow the military to focus on its core mission.
There are many different ways to
look at the budget figures. I would
argue that in order to compare apples to apples, the fiscal year 2010 total
should include supplemental funding -- both the new request, and “forward
funding” provided in the 2009 supplemental.
Looking at it that way, the fiscal year 2011 request represents a very
modest increase, about 2.8 percent.
In these difficult economic times,
it is particularly important to remind ourselves and the American people that
the International Affairs Budget is little more than one percent of the
entire federal budget, and only a small fraction of the amount we spend on
defense.
Madam Secretary, we look forward to
hearing your testimony on the budget request and the Administration’s foreign
policy priorities.